thanks for the replies. on this project it turns out I didn't have to do this in the end, but it's a really interesting area, and something I'll certainly use in the future. we're very keen on the whole fire-and-forget paradigm that JMS offers. I had a look around Joe's idea of interacting with the JMX Mbean, and it looks easy to do with Spring JMX support.
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/jmx.html#jmx-proxy -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/interacting-with-embedded-queue-with-Spring-JMS-tp26412755p26429485.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
