Hi Aaron,
we've spent a lot time addressing file handles/startup time - ActiveMQ
scales well in 5.3
cheers,
Rob
On 20 Nov 2009, at 11:40, Aaron Mulder wrote:
It was my experience that ActiveMQ does not handle that well
(destinations are not particularly "lightweight") and you'd do better
to have a smaller number of destinations with selectors. RAM is not
the main/only issue -- file handles and startup time also caused
problems.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Igor Katkov <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
Is it a good idea to create 500ooo+ queues and send messages to these
destinations? Load is a few messages per _minute_ into each queue.
Producers and consumers will be on different hosts. Network of
brokers
topology.
Does anyone have experience pushing ActiveMQ that far, or even
further with
2M queues and several messages a second?
Will it scale to that extent? I can add boxes to host additional
producers
and consumers, but not sure if pushing metadata of that mighty
number of
queues around will be handled OK
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/500ooo%2B-queues--tp26417356p26417356.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
