I am planning to move to 5.3 this week. We are not experiencing some time outs and messages lost on the systems (the messages have an expiration time).
I just was wondering if the cause was a slow consumer or the system itself. For some of these lost messages, the message doesn't get to the consumer. -----Original Message----- From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 3:24 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Best implementation for reply-request there could well be an improvement using nio. Also - it it possible to move to version 5.3 - which is generally a lot more stable. Btw - you didn't mention if you were having performance problems ? cheers, Rob On 25 Nov 2009, at 19:55, Andres Rangel wrote: > Bruce thanks for your reply. > The consumers create the temporary queue only once, and they are > cached in a pool for subsequent usage. > We are using tcp connection. If we move to nio connection, will > there be any noticeable improvement? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:bruce.sny...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 1:45 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: Best implementation for reply-request > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Andres Rangel > <andr...@corp.moniker.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have currently running apache activemq 5.2 in a network of brokers >> >> >> >> It has close to 1500 producers and 1200 consumers. >> >> This producers have each one a temporary queue so that will be 1500 >> temp queues in the system. >> >> >> >> The reply-request is implemented using temporary queues. >> >> >> >> >> >> I would like to know if there's a performance hit by using temporary >> queues instead of using another option. >> >> >> >> What do you guys think? > > There's more overhead involved with such constant creation/destruction > of temp queues, but that's it. As long as the broker has been tuned to > scale for handling such a large number of destinations, then you > should be OK: > > http://activemq.apache.org/scaling-queues.html > > Bruce > -- > perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\! > G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" > );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
