Gary Tully wrote: > Those log messages are developer debug aids that were added early on in the > dev cycle and possibly should now be removed. If those messages can be interpreted by end user why not leave them in? Right now I agree that they might be of little use, because we haven't got any yard stick to measure against. It could become useful if someone could say, "well anything below 500 ms is nothing to worry" - or - "well, once you go above five seconds you really need to consider the configuration and the hardware".
I understand that it all depends on the load, even so lets start somewhere. As I've seen mentioned that anything below 500 ms will be filtered ouy in the future, can we assume that's a "safe" level? And if so, where is a first rough upper bound where you would start to monitor the situation? 3 s? 5? 10? 30? Thanks -- Fredrik Jonson