nice! - thx titexe
On 15 Dec 2009, at 09:21, titexe wrote:
by putting this config KahaDB, I had the same performance as
Kahapersistenceadaptor:
<persistenceAdapter>
<kahaDB directory="${activemq.base}/data/kahadb"
enableJournalDiskSyncs="false" indexWriteBatchSize="10000"
indexCacheSize="1000"/>
</ persistenceAdapter>
titexe
titexe wrote:
Hello,
using kahaDB, could you have the same performance?
Because I encounter the same problem, even using what in
ActiveMQ-througthput.xml
best regards,
titexe
Duro wrote:
Hi,
i've tested kahadb and kahaPersistenceAdapter using same simple test
conditions i.e.
- persistent queue
- 3 consumers
- 1 producer
- 25 kb message size (10 000 msgs)
according this, kahadb has troughput 22 msgs/s while
kahaPersistenceAdapter 333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using
kahadb with amq 5.3, amq 5.4 snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is
that? Is
it possible to somehow configure kahadb (or message producer) to get
better results?
Duro
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26791867.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
