Hi James, I belive that building a distro from the binary tarball is the best way to go, as they should be in sync and we can create distros in the release process.
I started experementing with unix-maven-plugin http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/activemq/trunk/assembly/pom-rpm.xml?r=HEAD but it doesn't behave quite as I expect. One other thing is that it needs to be executed on the specific platform as it is just a wrapper for the native commands. So, I'm thinking about doing it without maven as I don't see any advantages of it. BTW. I'll use https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2105 for all related work in this area. Thanks for your contribution and please post your comments. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:14 PM, James Casey <jamesc....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > we've done a lot of work on packaging nice rpms (for FUSE releases) which > fit in well to the linux file system hierarchy[1]. Currently the starting > point for our packaging is a binary tarball, but getting it generated from > maven would be nice. > > We'd be interested in contributing what we've done to the packaging effort > once you have the initial maven work done. > > cheers, > > James. > -- > [1] http://www.sysadmin.hep.ac.uk/svn/grid-monitoring/trunk/msg/fuse-rpm > > > On 6 April 2010 11:36, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote: > > > Hi Justin, > > > > that's great. It'd be also great to have some docs on the topic at > ActiveMQ > > web site. Also, I started working on creating Linux packages (rpm, deb, > > ...) > > that should make deployment a bit easier. > > > > Cheers > > -- > > Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb > > > > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ > > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:49 AM, mjustin <michael.jus...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > for some product demos (Delphi and Java integration with ActiveMQ) I am > > > interested in running a small Ubuntu Linux instance on Amazon EC2 with > > > ActiveMQ, which would provide a ready to use environment where no Java > > and > > > ActiveMQ download and installation is required. > > > > > > Yesterday I did a quick test and managed to install and run ActiveMQ > > 5.3.1 > > > remotely in a couple of minutes. Storage and usage costs depend on the > > > machine size and "opening times". Storage costs for the image are $0.50 > > per > > > month so I will give it a try and write about it on my blog and share > > some > > > installation guides and links. > > > > > > Regarding the 'public' availability of the ActiveMQ instance and > traffic > > > costs, I have one question: are there global settings in ActiveMQ to > > limit > > > the size, speed or number of messages producers can send? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > ----- > > > Michael Justin > > > SCJP, SCJA > > > betasoft - Software for Delphi™ and for the Java™ platform > > > http://www.mikejustin.com - http://www.betabeans.de > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-running-on-Amazon-EC2-%28Elastic-Compute-Cloud%29-tp28148057p28148057.html > > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > >
