No. Not required. See explanation in previous reply!
Gary Tully wrote: > > NFSv4? > > On 9 April 2010 23:14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hello there! We are using 5.3.1 deployed as a HA failover cluster via an >> NFS >> mount. >> >> We are able to kill a broker (which we are calling the HOT broker) and >> get >> a >> second broker (or COLD broker) to take over with only a few messages lost >> in >> transition (353 out of 1.3 Million) which are chalking up to "was in >> transit >> in memory on the way to the NFS server". However, if we restart the HOT >> broker it waits for the exclusive lock and if we kill the COLD broker >> (which >> is then the live broker) we get what looks like either KahaDB or >> persistent-store corruption and are unable to continue until we stop both >> brokers, rm -rf the store/data directory then restart the HOT broker. >> >> Has anyone else seen this issue? Anyone know what we could do to make it >> fail BACK to HOT without failure? >> >> Next up for us will be HA failover with network of brokers and we'll post >> how we did it with an NFS mount when we get it to work! >> >> Thank you all! >> >> Steve Mays >> Edmunds.com >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Failover-and-Fail-BACK-tp28198179p28198179.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > http://blog.garytully.com > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Failover-and-Fail-BACK-tp28198179p28232430.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
