Hi Clark,
I'm using Client-Server topology, meaning I just access ActiveMQ via tcp. I
do it like this:
final String brokerURL = "tcp://localhost:61616";
ConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new
ActiveMQConnectionFactory(brokerURL);
context.addComponent("jms",
JmsComponent.jmsComponentAutoAcknowledge(connectionFactory));
where context is obviously my DefaultCamelContext object.
As for the config files, I haven't changed anything. My activemq.xml looks
like this:
<!--
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
(the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-->
<beans
xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd";>
<!-- Allows us to use system properties as variables in this
configuration file -->
<bean
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
<property name="locations">
<value>file:${activemq.base}/conf/credentials.properties</value>
</property>
</bean>
<!--
The <broker> element is used to configure the ActiveMQ broker.
-->
<broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
brokerName="localhost" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data"
destroyApplicationContextOnStop="true">
<!--
For better performances use VM cursor and small memory
limit.
For more information, see:
http://activemq.apache.org/message-cursors.html
Also, if your producer is "hanging", it's probably due to
producer flow control.
For more information, see:
http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html
-->
<destinationPolicy>
<policyMap>
<policyEntries>
<policyEntry topic=">" producerFlowControl="true"
memoryLimit="1mb">
<pendingSubscriberPolicy>
<vmCursor />
</pendingSubscriberPolicy>
</policyEntry>
<policyEntry queue=">" producerFlowControl="true"
memoryLimit="1mb">
<!-- Use VM cursor for better latency
For more information, see:
http://activemq.apache.org/message-cursors.html
<pendingQueuePolicy>
<vmQueueCursor/>
</pendingQueuePolicy>
-->
</policyEntry>
</policyEntries>
</policyMap>
</destinationPolicy>
<!--
The managementContext is used to configure how ActiveMQ is
exposed in
JMX. By default, ActiveMQ uses the MBean server that is started
by
the JVM. For more information, see:
http://activemq.apache.org/jmx.html
-->
<managementContext>
<managementContext createConnector="false"/>
</managementContext>
<!--
Configure message persistence for the broker. The default
persistence
mechanism is the KahaDB store (identified by the kahaDB tag).
For more information, see:
http://activemq.apache.org/persistence.html
-->
<persistenceAdapter>
<kahaDB directory="${activemq.base}/data/kahadb"/>
</persistenceAdapter>
<!--
The systemUsage controls the maximum amount of space the broker
will
use before slowing down producers. For more information, see:
http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html
<systemUsage>
<systemUsage>
<memoryUsage>
<memoryUsage limit="20 mb"/>
</memoryUsage>
<storeUsage>
<storeUsage limit="1 gb" name="foo"/>
</storeUsage>
<tempUsage>
<tempUsage limit="100 mb"/>
</tempUsage>
</systemUsage>
</systemUsage>
-->
<!--
The transport connectors expose ActiveMQ over a given protocol
to
clients and other brokers. For more information, see:
http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-transports.html
-->
<transportConnectors>
<transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://0.0.0.0:61616"/>
</transportConnectors>
</broker>
<!--
Uncomment to enable Camel
Take a look at activemq-camel.xml for more details
<import resource="camel.xml"/>
-->
<!--
Enable web consoles, REST and Ajax APIs and demos
Take a look at activemq-jetty.xml for more details
-->
<import resource="jetty.xml"/>
</beans>
I tried to enable camel in activemq.xml by uncommenting the <import
resource="camel.xml"/> line, but it doesn't seem to help either - still
getting mixed up messages.
My camel.xml looks like that:
<!--
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
(the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-->
<!--
Lets deploy some Enterprise Integration Patterns inside the ActiveMQ
Message Broker
For more information, see:
http://camel.apache.org
Include this file in your configuration to enable Camel
e.g. <import resource="camel.xml"/>
-->
<beans
xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring/camel-spring.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd";>
<camelContext id="camel" xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";>
<!-- You can use a <packages> element for each root package to
search for Java routes -->
<packageScan>
<package>org.foo.bar</package>
</packageScan>
<!-- You can use Spring XML syntax to define the routes here using
the <route> element -->
<route>
<from uri="activemq:example.A"/>
<to uri="activemq:example.B"/>
</route>
</camelContext>
<!--
Lets configure some Camel endpoints
http://camel.apache.org/components.html
-->
<!-- configure the camel activemq component to use the current broker
-->
<bean id="activemq"
class="org.apache.activemq.camel.component.ActiveMQComponent" >
<property name="userName" value="${activemq.username}"/>
<property name="password" value="${activemq.password}"/>
</bean>
</beans>
I'm not sure if any other config files might have impact on what is going on
in my case. If yes, please do let me know.
regards
cobrien wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Can you describe a little more your Queue topology and configuration-
> perhaps even share your config file(s). Not all queue topologies are order
> preserving!
> -clark
>
> Clark
>
> www.ttmsolutions.com
> ActiveMQ reference guide at
> http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
>
>
> sonicBasher wrote:
>>
>> At the end of my camel route I have a following class which I use to put
>> messages in ActiveMQ:
>>
>> public class MessageProducer {
>>
>> private ProducerTemplate template = null;
>>
>> public MessageProducer(ProducerTemplate template) {
>> this.template = template;
>> }
>>
>> public void produce(@Body List listOfEttexObj) {
>> System.out.println("Entered produce() method");
>> XStream x = new XStream();
>> List<EttexObject> listOfEttexObjects =
>> (List<EttexObject>)listOfEttexObj;
>> for (int q = 0; q < listOfEttexObjects.size(); q++) {
>> EttexObject eo = listOfEttexObjects.get(q);
>> template.sendBody("jms:" + eo.getAccountName() +
>> "_2",x.toXML(eo));
>> System.out.println("Sent type: " +
>> eo.getMessage().getType());
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> *XStream is just a library for converting objects to XML, has nothing to
>> do with anything
>> **EttexObject is my POJO class
>>
>> Now, I noticed that whenever I send objects (from the list passed as an
>> argument) to the queues, which I implicitly create using
>> ProducerTemplate, most of the time the order of delivered messages is
>> correct, but there's always one queue, which gets the mixed up messages.
>> I can't really figure out why. I tried to use the requestBody method,
>> instead of sendBody, to no avail. I also double checked the lists that
>> come in - the order of objects inside them is fine. Honestly I'm kind of
>> stuck here. Will be grateful for any tips.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> p.s. Can synchronous/asynchronous ActiveMQ mode have anything to do with
>> my problem?
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-mixes-up-order-of-messages-while-receiving-them-from-Camel-tp29008581p29021233.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
