You're right. I was using for the jmsTransactionManager the org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory instead of the org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory.
I will test this later. Thank you for your quick response. Regards, Shurbann Martes On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > You need to look into the cache level, think the spring default is to > cache nothing if there is a transaction manager present as there is in > your case. > > You may want to try cache_connection at a minimum. > > There are OS TCP level config options to configure the TIME_WAIT > window but it may be better to tackle the excessive connection > creation a the jms application level. > > On 24 August 2010 11:56, Shurbann Martes <s.d.c.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi ActiveMQ, > > > > Thank you for taking time to answer my question. > > > > I have the following issue. I'm using ActiveMQ in combination with > Spring: > > > > <bean > > class="org.springframework.jms.listener.DefaultMessageListenerContainer"> > > <property name="connectionFactory" ref="pooledFactory" /> > > <property name="destination" ref="requestQueue" /> > > <property name="messageListener" ref="productRequestProcessorMdp" /> > > <property name="concurrentConsumers" value="1" /> > > <property name="maxConcurrentConsumers" value="5" /> > > <property name="transactionManager" ref="jmsTransactionManager" /> > > </bean> > > > > It's using the TCP Transport: tcp://localhost:61616 > > > > This was working fine, until an increase in usage of the service lately: > > > > I noticed lately that the amount of socket connection connecting on the > port > > 61616 is huge (> 780) of which only 15 is ESTABLISHED and the other are > > TIME_WAIT. > > > > Lately my container/machine starts giving too many socket connections > during > > peek hours. (I've taken care of ulimit -n on OS level). Now I'm starting > to > > look at the connections of this machine and more then 80% is on the > account > > ActiveMQ. > > > > My questions are > > - Anyone have/had this problem? > > - Is there a way of putting a max connection to the broker? > > - How can I make the TIME_WAIT interval smaller? > > - Any other suggestion of decreasing the amount of connections to the > > broker? > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > Regards, > > SM > > > > > > -- > http://blog.garytully.com > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com >
