Some series of steps that can reproduce or in the ideal case a junit
test we can drop into the source.

On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, Colleen Velo <cmv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gary
> re: JConsole - don't know yet. I will try to hook JConsole up and look
> through that as well -
> currently using the bundled web admin console.
>
> As far as test case, I don't have one - just the standard message traffic
> from
> our producers to our consumers (slightly less than the traffic that is
> running
> currently in our Product environment with ActiveMQ server version 5.2.0.
>
> What would you need exactly for a "test" case?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Colleen Velo
> *email: cmv...@gmail.com*
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> does jconsole show the same negative number? Do you have a test case?
>>
>> On 1 September 2010 13:52, Colleen Velo <cmv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > After only running my 3 ActiveMQ brokers for short time, I am seeing
>> > negative numbers in
>> > the "Number of Pending Messages" column.  I started seeing this at 5.3.2
>> > (after upgrading
>> > from 5.2.0) and opened and issue on it:
>> >            • https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2887
>> >
>> > It was recommended that I upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.4.0, which I did,
>> however, I
>> > am still
>> > seeing this issue.
>> >
>> > Current Environment:
>> > • CentOS release 5.2 (both consumers and brokers)
>> > • 3 ActiveMQ brokers
>> > • 7 consumers (across different queues)
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Colleen Velo
>> > email: cmv...@gmail.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://blog.garytully.com
>>
>> Open Source Integration
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>

-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to