Not really. Just tested on 5.4.1-fuse and messages are gone with the wind ;)
Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> writes: > with the caveat that there is no durability of the message. But yes, > when a durable sub is offline, the persistent messages will be held in > memory. > > On 14 December 2010 15:38, Aleksandar Ivanisevic > <aleksan...@ivanisevic.de> wrote: >> Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> >> writes: >> >>> if you set persistent=false on BrokerService, (broker in xml config) >>> it will use an in memory store. >> >> And durable topics will keep working as they should? >> >>> >>> On 14 December 2010 10:01, Aleksandar Ivanisevic >>> <aleksan...@ivanisevic.de> wrote: >>>> Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> >>>> writes: >>>> >>>>> Non persistent messages can be sent to a durable sub, but the durable >>>>> sub will only get the messages if it connected, a backlog will not be >>>>> retained as the messages will not be stored >>>>> It will behave like a regular topic subscription in this regard. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, thats what I figured too. Is it possible to configure AMQ to >>>> have persistance store only in memory? Or do I have to wrangle tmpfs? >>>> >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://blog.garytully.com >>> http://fusesource.com >>> >> >> -- >> Ti si arogantan, prepotentan i peglaš vlastitu frustraciju. -- Ivan >> Tišljar, hr.comp.os.linux >> >> > > > > -- > http://blog.garytully.com > http://fusesource.com > -- Ti si arogantan, prepotentan i peglaš vlastitu frustraciju. -- Ivan Tišljar, hr.comp.os.linux
