yes, in the default case i can't , but in my case i have a distributed filesystem underneath so i have to play with activemq so as to achieve it. That's what i want to do.
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:21:46 +0100 > Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers > From: de...@nighttale.net > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > You can't achieve that in distributed environment and different > producers. And what's the FIFO anyway in that case? You can probably > use Camel Resequencer (http://camel.apache.org/resequencer.html) to > arrange messages according to some of your app specific property. > > > Cheers > -- > Dejan Bosanac > ----------------- > FuseSource - The experts in open source integration and messaging. > Email: dej...@fusesource.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: http://twitter.com/dejanb > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Petrucci Andreas > <petrucci_2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > yes but what i cannot understand is how their FIFO property is preserved > > in queues. I mean a queue is distributed in two or more brokers of the > > network. How is it possible for a queue say TEST.FOO queue to preserve its > > FIFO property when its messages are distributed at two or more brokers??? > > > >> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:50:42 +0100 > >> Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers > >> From: de...@nighttale.net > >> To: users@activemq.apache.org > >> > >> Sure they can. Messages stays on the broker where they are produced > >> until consumer arrives, when they are delivered to it. > >> > >> Cheers > >> -- > >> Dejan Bosanac > >> ----------------- > >> FuseSource - The experts in open source integration and messaging. > >> Email: dej...@fusesource.com > >> Web: http://fusesource.com > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/dejanb > >> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > >> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Petrucci Andreas > >> <petrucci_2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > thanks for the reply, i'm aware of the network-of-brokers solution but i > >> > doubt if 2 distinct producers can produce messages for the SAME queue at > >> > 2 different brokers of the network. Yes, in my setup i really need > >> > multiple brokers but i think that what i ask for (i think that it) > >> > cannot be provided by a network of brokers . > >> > > >> >> To: petrucci_2...@hotmail.com; users@activemq.apache.org > >> >> From: dirk.froeh...@email.de > >> >> Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers > >> >> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:31:03 +0100 > >> >> > >> >> Afternoon, > >> >> > >> >> As far as I understand your use case, you can set up a so called > >> >> network of brokers to achieve this. > >> >> A NWOB is a collection of brokers that know about each other. > >> >> Destinations are distributed on the participating nodes as far as > >> >> they're involved. Clients can connect to any of the nodes to produce > >> >> messages. The same applies for consumption, since messages are > >> >> forwarded to one of the nodes that has a subscriber for a particular > >> >> destination. > >> >> > >> >> But: You wrote about multiple brokers within one network. You should > >> >> double check if you really need multiple brokers, since the main reason > >> >> for a NWOB would be to scale horizontally (for queues) or to distribute > >> >> destinations over multiple networks. Unless you really have significant > >> >> traffic, one node can handle quite a lot of queue messages (several > >> >> k/s, depending on infrastructure and persistence). > >> >> > >> >> Hope that helps. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Dirk Fröhner > >> >> Sent from one of my smartphones > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ----- Reply message ----- > >> >> From: "Petrucci Andreas" <petrucci_2...@hotmail.com> > >> >> Date: Mon, Dec 27, 2010 12:50 > >> >> Subject: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers > >> >> To: <users@activemq.apache.org> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Hello there, all i want ot ask is there there is a specific setup of > >> >> activemq brokers such that we will have multiple brokers in our network > >> >> that can serve clients that are producing (just producing) messages for > >> >> one ( just one) queue. As far as i can see , there is no way to achieve > >> >> that. Am I right? Any ideas? :) > >> >> > >> >> thnks in advance, > >> >> Petrucci > >> >> > >> > > >
