Thanks Claus, we are kind of divided our route - one as transacted and another one as not transacted - so that we be in line with activemq redelivery mechanism.
Btw, Camel redelivery mechanism seems beneficial as it re-starts at the point of failure, why not activemq go that way? Thanks & Regards Venkatesh Laguduva On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > You have two different systems capable of doing redeliveries > - ActiveMQ > - Camel > > ActiveMQ will redeliver from the beginning of the route again > Camel will redeliver at the point of the error > > ActiveMQ can only redeliver JMS messages (or the other formats it supports) > Camel can redeliver any kind of message. > > So when using ActiveMQ and transacted, then its recommended to not use > Camel redelivery at the same time. > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Venkatesh Laguduva > <lbvenkat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well Torsten, we use Camel and redelivery always happen at the point of > > failure. > > > > Thanks & Regards > > Venkatesh Laguduva > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Torsten Mielke <tors...@fusesource.com > >wrote: > > > >> > >> On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Venkatesh Laguduva wrote: > >> > >> > this time, message was tried from the start of the route instead of > >> trying > >> > from the point of failure > >> > >> Not sure I fully understand you but every message that is retried will > be > >> sent through the entire Camel route again. > >> > >> > >> > >> Torsten Mielke > >> tors...@fusesource.com > >> tmie...@blogspot.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > FuseSource > Email: cib...@fusesource.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ >
