Are these persistent messages? From my own performance tests I know that enqueuing a persistent message takes longer than dequeuing it, which is the opposite behavior from what you're seeing. Persistent msgs need to be persisted to the brokers store.
Do you encounter the same behavior when turning off compression? Are producer/broker/consumer on the same machine? Also, I presume there are no transactions used? Torsten Mielke tors...@fusesource.com tmie...@blogspot.com On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:32 AM, lzr wrote: > Hi all, > > > In my cases, I produces and consumes messages with big data: 40K per message, > 10000 messages produced and consumed for each exchange. For better > performance I used jms.useCompression in my connection and it did work well: > 10000 messages sent in 5 seconds; > But my consumer takes about 70 seconds to receive these messages from queue > (Just received, no process to message). > How is the consumer so lower than producer? Is there any optimization to the > consumer? > > > It's much appreciated if any suggestions! > > > Best regards, > Zhuran Li
