glad you got sorted. for sure you can, please do raise an issue against the doc, and attach any updates/improvements that you have, just be sure to tick the license grand checkbox on the file attache form.
all contributions are gratefully received :-) On 13 March 2012 10:47, Mark Anderson <manderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the pointer. It seems that what I was missing in my > configuration was setting the topic prefetch size on the connection factory. > > I think the online documentation could really do with a clear of example of > how to configure ActiveMQ without producer flow control. I had to spend a > good few hours jumping between various parts of the documentation, googling > and eventually finding the unit test that triggered my question here. > > Can you submit bugs against the documentation? I would consider submitting > a patch/new documentation if that was possible. > > Mark > > > On 9 March 2012 20:50, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> look a the other test in there that uses a topic for inspiration, >> those consumers are using the temp store >> for their pending messages. >> >> org.apache.activemq.bugs.TempStorageBlockedBrokerTest#testRunProducerWithHungConsumer >> >> the testFillTempAndConsume does not have a consumer, so the topic >> variant just discards messages. >> >> >> On 9 March 2012 15:18, Mark Anderson <manderso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I am having problems trying to get non-persistent messages sent via a >> topic >> > to use temp storage when the memory usage limit is reached. >> > >> > In my search for a solution I found a reference to the following unit >> test >> > as an example of how to configure ActiveMQ to use temp storage for >> > non-persistent messages: >> > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/bugs/TempStorageBlockedBrokerTest.java?view=markup&pathrev=1233367 >> > >> > When I edit the test case testFillTempAndConsume to use a topic instead >> of >> > a queue it fails and no data is written to the temp storage. >> > >> > Is the usage of temp storage with topics supported in this way? >> > >> > I found issue AMQ-3738 (Cursors not dealing with topic memoryLimit >> > overflow) which sounds like the same issue as I am seeing. Is this a bug >> in >> > ActiveMQ and if so is it likely to be resolved in the immediate future? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Mark >> >> >> >> -- >> http://fusesource.com >> http://blog.garytully.com >> -- http://fusesource.com http://blog.garytully.com
