On 16 March 2012 09:15, Torsten Mielke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Greg, > > Both statements are correct.
[Snip: In summary, a single broker will maintain order, multiple brokers may not under failure] > Hope this helps. It does, thank you. As I want resilient, ordered delivery I think I'll send the same message to two non-clustered brokers and put in a simple mechanism to detect duplicates. If one broker fails, the other will continue to deliver in order. It could possibly be done with a replicated message store instead, but in this case I think sending the same message twice will suffice. Thanks, Greg
