That seems like a restricted solution that the Consumer should be a servlet. May I know why?
What I have is a standalone Consumer (for testing purposes). Not sure how the Production systems are, but the standalone Consumer dies as soon as the Master is down. I have been looking for a solution to this since yesterday but without no luck! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/master-slave-consumer-can-not-failover-tp4653639p4655344.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
