It indeed seems that there are two different Kaha persistence adapters, the KahaPersistenceAdapter and KahaDBPersistenceAdapter. So what you are saying is that the KahaDBPersistenceAdapter should work better? Or were you just pointing out an error in my previous post (me talking about KahaDB instead of Kaha)?
The fact that there are two so similarly named persistence adapters is quite confusing. Perhaps other one should be deprecated. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Issues-with-KahaDB-persistence-in-ActiveMQ-5-6-0-IndexOutOfBoundsException-IllegalStateException-tp4658031p4658040.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
