configured 2 brokers using the shared file syntax However, the slave broker is always looking for the database connection and is not starting up. Is this the expected behavior?
Log from the slave broker INFO | jvm 1 | 2013/01/08 10:14:40 | INFO | Database \\servername\Shared-Queue\data\kahadb\lock is locked... waiting 10 seconds for the database to be unlocked. Reason: java.io.IOException: File '\\Ssmsftd1\Shared-Queue\data\kahadb\lock' could not be locked. INFO | jvm 1 | 2013/01/08 10:14:50 | INFO | Database \\servername\Shared-Queue\data\kahadb\lock is locked... waiting 10 seconds for the database to be unlocked. Reason: java.io.IOException: File '\\Ssmsftd1\Shared-Queue\data\kahadb\lock' could not be locked. INFO | jvm 1 | 2013/01/08 10:15:00 | INFO | Database \\servername\Shared-Queue\data\kahadb\lock is locked... waiting 10 seconds for the database to be unlocked. Reason: java.io.IOException: File '\\Ssmsftd1\Shared-Queue\data\kahadb\lock' could not be locked. INFO | jvm 1 | 2013/01/08 10:15:10 | INFO | Database \\servername\Shared-Queue\data\kahadb\lock is locked... waiting 10 seconds for the database to be unlocked. Reason: java.io.IOException: File '\\Ssmsftd1\Shared-Queue\data\kahadb\lock' could not be locked. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/SHARED-FILE-SYSTEM-MASTER-SLAVE-newb-tp4661492.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
