Hi James, Thanks for the comments. Also, I put a little more detail about the critical part of what I am after in a previous response on a different relpy on this thread.
Mulling over it for awhile, does the following sound feasible? Or am I getting convoluted? "Normal" flow of messages from one step to the next would be Step1Q_1 --> work is done by a process --> Step2Q_1 --> work is done by a process, etc...... In addition, an order update Q (that producers send messages to when the importance changes), these messages are consumed by a process that looks for the message in the update in any of the Step* queues, (Using browse (hopefully in a manner where I don't have to look at every message) when the message is found in a specific step Q, use Resequencer to reorder them by my duration header property and into a new Q. So that Step1Q_1 is re sequenced as Step1Q_2. I would then delete the Step1Q_1. The consumers always using a wildcard of Step1Q_*. I would have to be able to produce the message into Step1Q_* as well. It's not clear to me that I can produce messages using a wildcard? Have I gone off the deep end here? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reorder-of-messages-tp4658449p4663269.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
