I understand we have the 9 priorities... so my original plan to intersperse the messages was to pick a random priority between 0 & 9 and assign that to the message. In the long term, that should be an even distribution among producers. My boss however complained that probably 1 ProducerB message will get a 1 and 14k ProducerA messages will get a 1, but 85k ProducerA messages will get a higher priority. So ProducerB will have to wait for over 85k messages to be processed before it gets to that one last message. Thats the issue we were trying to solve.
-- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-this-possible-with-ActiveMQ-tp4666219p4666223.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
