I would LOVE to help, but I would have no idea how to replicate the
    problem.  If I could replicate the problem, I'd know what I needed
    to do to solve or work-around it.  The tests you pointed me to
    probably do eliminate the cause of that issue, but the problem
    probably is triggered by other unanticipated factors.  Based on the
    fact that not all my log files are being cleaned up, I'd venture to
    guess my issue is a configuration problem or some obscure faux pas
    in my client code. 
    
    I'm not sure how to help you help me! 
    
    Mark 
    
    On 4/30/2013 12:53 PM, ceposta [via
      ActiveMQ] wrote: 
    
     If you could put together a test we can get to the
      bottom of it. Looks like
      
      Gary put together these tests to show AMQ-4118 was solved:
      
      
      
      
https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/DurableSubsOfflineSelectorConcurrentConsumeIndexUseTest.java?r=1400317
 
      
      
      On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, fenbers < [hidden email] >
      wrote:
      
      
        > Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4118 ,
        the report says
        
        > this issue is fixed in 5.8.0, but I am running 5.8.0 and
        still have exactly
        
        > the same 3 stack traces as listed in the URL above.
         Moreover, I have
        
        > numbered .log files (journal files) that never get cleaned
        up
        
        > automatically.
        
        > These average about every 7th file or so that does not get
        removed.  TRACE
        
        > log entries indicate that two of the topics (of 5 total
        topics) are the
        
        > culprits, but I cannot figure out why.  I have been trying
        to resolve this
        
        > for a year now!!  I've traced my code for the 3 topics that
        don't leave
        
        > complaints vs the 2 topics that do leave complaints and I
        can't see any
        
        > functional differences in my code.
        
        >
        
        > I'm at a loss!  I'm currently running 5.8.0...
        
        >
        
        > Mark
        
        >
        
        >
        
        >
        
        > --
        
        > View this message in context:
        
        > 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-AMQ-4118-really-fixed-Doubt-it-tp4666470.html
 
        > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
        Nabble.com.
        
        >
      
      
      
      
      -- 
      *Christian Posta*
      
      http://www.christianposta.com/blog 
      twitter: @christianposta
      
       http://www.christianposta.com/blog 
      
      
      
      
      
        If you reply to this email, your
          message will be added to the discussion below: 
        
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-AMQ-4118-really-fixed-Doubt-it-tp4666470p4666474.html
 
      
      
        To unsubscribe from Is AMQ-4118 really fixed?? Doubt it..., click
          here . 
        NAML  
    
    
  



mark_fenbers.vcf (360 bytes) 
<http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4666477/0/mark_fenbers.vcf>




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-AMQ-4118-really-fixed-Doubt-it-tp4666470p4666477.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to