Hi,

Any extra info on this?

Regards


On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Jesus Roncero <je...@we7.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:34:03AM -0700, Christian Posta wrote:
> > When you have producer flow control enabled, your producers should block
> > when you've reached the memory limits (50mb). If you can write a unit
> test
> > that shows otherwise, I would gladly take a look.
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> again thanks for your help.
>
> I have been testing it a bit with different settings, and I'm sort of
> getting
> the same behaviour.
>
> I have two different test configurations:
>
> 1) Flow control enabled (by default) on all queues and topics. 50 Mb memory
> Limit, and no cursors. Temp storage set to 500 Mb.
> http://pastebin.com/Ma7b4B6V
>
> 2) Flow control disabled and cursors set to use files and temporary
> storage.
> Again, memory is 50Mb per queue, Temp storage set to 500 Mb.
> http://pastebin.com/3t9p2NqX
>
> 3) a simple producer writen in python, based on stomp.py:
> http://pastebin.com/1Uge3mvC
>
> Basically, with these configs, I'm seeing the same behaviour, the producer
> starts inserting messages, on around the 36 Mb mark, it starts using the
> temporary file storage, and then it pauses on the 483 message, saying the
> temp storate is full. 36, being ~ 70% of 50.
>
> Always with a log like:
> [2013-06-07 12:07:23,975] INFO ActiveMQ Transport: 
> tcp:///10.0.9.124:40507org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue -
> Usage(default:temp:queue://testqueue:temp) percentUsage=96%,
> usage=536510464, limit=524288000,
> percentUsageMinDelta=1%;Parent:Usage(default:temp) percentUsage=102%,
> usage=536510464, limit=524288000, percentUsageMinDelta=1%: Temp Store is
> Full (96% of 524288000). Stopping producer
> (ID:mneme-54444-1370603136982-2:1:-1:1) to prevent flooding
> queue://testqueue. See
> http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html for more info
> (blocking for: 91s)
>
>
> So, anyway, what I'm trying to do is to have a sane config that at least is
> not going to explode, with both flow control enabled and flow control
> disabled. If temporary usage via the cursors is supposed to work
> like this, then it's all good. It might also be that I'm not really
> understanding how this is supposed to work, in that case feel free to RTFM
> me
> ;-).
>
> I don't know if this is what you want as a unit test, but let me know
> otherwise, and I'll procure whatever is necessary.
>
> Thanks again with your help.
>
> --
> JRF
>



-- 
Jesús Roncero

Reply via email to