Post what you have... it should work.. How are you trying to discover the instances?
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Laurence <faroe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get activemq discovery via xml configuration to work by > broadcasting machine ip address instead of name (I can make this happen > with > Groovy code for an embedded broker, but I want to do this for a standard > default activemq install with xml configuration). > > I've read that in the past this was not possible with ActiveMQ with > configuration to configure the connector publishedAddressPolicy, but I also > did some googling which led me to think it might be possible now with > ActiveMQ. > > I've tried to configure the connector publishedAddressPolicy for ActiveMQ > 5.8, but have not been able to get this to work. Does anyone know if it is > really possible to configure the publishedAddressPolicy for a connector? If > so could you send me an example? > > Thanks, > > Laurence > > p.s. The reason I want this to work is so that a default Redhat (or Redhat > clones) installation can successfully discover activemq server instances > (Mac and Win work fine, but to make Redhat work I need to discover server > by > IP instead of name). > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-spring-xml-configure-connector-publishedAddressPolicy-tp4668960.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
