Shouldn't there be a Shared File Locker element defined inside your kahaPersistenceAdapter?
See this page for examples: http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:29 PM, zhjt80 <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your quick reply, Ceposta. > > I tested with below scenes, > Master and Slave are both running on centos 6.0, kernal 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 > 1. Master and salve connect to the NFSv4 server. Master get the lock. > 2. I stop the NFS server for a while(about 3 minutes). Make NFS server > available again. > 3. The master CPU usage is very high, about 80%. the Process rpciod consume > most of CPU. > 4. The slave are also up. > > I need to restart master server. > > I also test with only one activeMQ server with NFS unavaiable, after NFS > resume, the CPU usage still very high. > What's cause this happen? Is there a work around? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-7-master-salve-nfs4-both-active-tp4669415p4669482.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
