Your disk drive/OS will correlate heavily with your persistence performance. Also whether or not you sync to disk, your message sizes, how much of the index is kept in memory, write buffer sizes, etc, etc.
Take a look at http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb.html and start benchmarking :) On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:50 AM, HellKnight <hellkni...@foxmail.com> wrote: > I did some more tests and I found the performance issue is due to message > persistence. If I chose to send non-persistent messages , it took less than > 1ms to send a message , even though by synchronous sends.I did not change > the default configration about message persistence in activemq.xml. Can > anyone give me any tips about optimize message persistence mechanism so as > to make it fast ? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Poor-performance-while-using-virtual-topic-mode-tp4672867p4672872.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
