Good point... verify the same numbers you see in hawtio are the same you see in jconsole. As for your assumption... the enqueue time is the time spent in the broker from "when the broker saw the send" to "when the broker dispatches to a consumer"
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:49 AM, James Strachan <james.strac...@gmail.com> wrote: > hawtio should be showing the same values as jconsole (its using the same > underlying JMX MBeans). Do you see the same values in jconsole too? > > > On 8 January 2014 17:47, uromahn <ulr...@ulrichromahn.net> wrote: > >> Simple answer: no I haven't had a message sitting around for such a long >> time. >> Also, I must assume that the "enqueue time" is the time it took to put a >> message into the queue and not the actual time it spent in a queue, but >> please correct me if I am wrong. >> >> Finally, I have a simple test as follows: >> 1. starting ActiveMQ >> 2. starting my test applicaiton writing about 1000 persistent messages into >> a queue - total duration less than a second >> 3. the same test application will read those 1000 messages from the queue - >> total duration less than a second >> 4. the overall enqueue/dequeue application was running for about 2 seconds >> but checking the statistics already shows enqueue times of about 15000 (in >> whatever unit that is). >> >> This "smells" like a bug to me. >> >> -Uli >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Statistics-Question-tp4676092p4676122.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > James > ------- > Red Hat > > Email: jstra...@redhat.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews > Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration -- Christian Posta http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
