What about the use of zookeeper for levelDB replication?  If you have a 
physical server, then you have a dedicated NIC that can handle the throughput 
by the use of quad ports (primary/secondary channeling) for improved 
performance.  With a VM, you do not have a dedicated NIC.


-----Original Message-----
From: artnaseef [mailto:a...@artnaseef.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:53 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ on Physical Server vs. VM

No more advantage than for any other application/service.  There's nothing 
inherit to ActiveMQ that needs real hardware - it relies entirely on the O/S to 
handle low-level hardware I/O.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-on-Physical-Server-vs-VM-tp4676715p4676716.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to