If I set updateURIsSupported=false do I need to reconfigure all the clients when I'm going to a a new broker ?

I cannot find the documentation for reconnectSupported here http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
what does that option mean ?

I do not understand clearly what is the maning of |priorityBackup while using the updateClusterClients features, that it, in a network of brokers where clients discover the existance of new brokers from informations received from the actually connected broker and do not necessarly known the URLs of every broker at startup

can you explain ?
|
thank you very much


Il 14/02/2014 15:52, Gary Tully ha scritto:
the rebalance is all about new brokers in the cluster, so the
rebalance should only fire on a broker start.

the priorityBackup options allow a failover client to be sticky. Also
updateURIsSupported=false and reconnectSupported=false disables this
feature client side

On 8 February 2014 17:07, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm facing a problem in my system due to the option rebalanceClusterClients.
As I can see when this option is enabled every time a new connection is
created a signal is sent to every connected client in the network and every
failover connection is closed and re-opened.
In my system it happens that when a producer (using failover tranport) is
inside a transaction and a new client connects then some of the messages are
dropped by KahaDB as beeing ssen as duplicates

Again, the rebalanceClusterClients option is very aggressive and generates a
lot of network/broker overhead in my system, when I have something like 100
cons JVM , which get disconnected and reconnected every time a new producer
(which is sporadically spawned) gets in.

Can I realize a setup like this ?
- failover transport producers insiede a transaction do not accept/silently
drop  the command to rebalance the cluster and reconnect
- not every client get reconnected at every new client attaches to the
cluster

thanks in advance
ActiveMQ is great


Enrico Olivelli



Reply via email to