you are not missing anything, there is no group coordination across networks except that messages are forwarded in groups. So a network consumer is treated like a normal consumer.
On 18 June 2014 17:52, thall <[email protected]> wrote: > I am also in need message group functionality inside a network of brokers. > From the testing I have done it appears that the JMS groups are maintained > on a per broker basis. For example: > if I send a message to Broker A and it already has a group associated with a > specific consumer, of its own, it will have that consumer process the > message. > But if I send a message to Broker B, it is completely unaware of the group > being allocated and will pick a new consumer to handle the message. Once > Broker B has done this future messages sent to Broker B will be handled by > this consumer. > The same goes for other brokers on the network. They all have a local map > of groups -> consumers, but there is no coordination between brokers. > > I have tried to validate this in the code, I can see the messageGroupOwners > maintained inside the queue, but I don't see any kind of coordination. > > Am I missing anything? or is this the expected behavior? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Groups-and-Network-of-Brokers-Still-not-supported-tp4678567p4682268.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com
