The priorityBackup=true URI option for the failover transport does exactly what you want. On Nov 16, 2014 4:39 PM, "atomicx6637" <tricha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have the following environment and would like some feedback on the > configuration I currently have. > > I have 2 MuleESB (mulep01, mulep02) servers which run applications that > produce and consume messages from my 2 ActiveMQ servers (amqp01, amqp02). > > The applications on the 2 mule server use > "failover://(tcp://amqp01:61616,tcp://amqp02:61616)?randomize=false" to > connect to the queues. > > I have my 2 ActiveMQ servers setup as a Network of Brokers by adding this > to > their respective config files: > > amqp01 > <networkConnectors> > <networkConnector uri="static:(tcp://amqp02:61616)"/> > </networkConnectors> > > amqp02 > <networkConnectors> > <networkConnector uri="static:(tcp://amqp01:61616)"/> > </networkConnectors> > > I have tested the failover of the ActiveMQ servers and the MuleServers seem > to pick everything up and will failover to amqp02 when amqp01 is not > available and will fail back to amqp01 once available and amqp02 fails. > > My first question is, *is there a way to automatically failback to amqp01 > when it becomes available or do you just wait for a restart of the producer > and consumers?* > > Second question with a lead in, I'm concerned about my 2 mule servers > pointing at different ActiveMQ servers if they are recycled and one of the > ActiveMQ server is unavailable at the time. For example: if I cycle > mulep01 > and the primary server amp01 is not available it will fail over to amp02, > if > I think cycle mulep02 and the primary server amp01 is available it will > connect to amp01, now I have 2 mule servers pointing at 2 different > ActiveMQ > servers. I could see this happening during monthly updates to our servers. > > I have tested this and it seems to still forward the messages to amp01 from > amp02 even though mulep02 is connected and has consumers on amp02. > > So my question is,* is this a concern? how should I be managing this? Do I > need to change my ActiveMQ configuration.* > > Any help on this would be great. > > Thanks > Troy > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Handling-Consumers-by-Server-ActiveMQ-MuleESB-tp4687486.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
