I'm not aware of one, though I've never actually used temp destinations so someone else might know of something I don't know about.
If there's not, you might want to submit a JIRA requesting that ActiveMQDestination.TEMP_DESTINATION_NAME_PREFIX be made modifiable so you can prefix all temp destinations with something like "ID:TEMP." instead of just "ID:", which I think would let you explicitly include (or exclude) temp destinations across the networkConnector. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:14 AM, azdvorak <alex.zdvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, I was able to bridge all destinations via <queue > physicalName=">"/> to confirm this will bridge temp destinations. Because > temp destinations use the brokerID in their name, is there a common > convention to specify only temp destinations via > <dynamicallyIncludedDestinations />? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reply-message-not-forwarded-across-temporary-bridged-destination-tp4688578p4688623.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
