https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5562
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > Yup.. Thanks Rob. I’ll do this today. > > Kevin > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Good point - I think it's a bug - you can always turn advisories off if >> you don't want a flood of them. Can you raise an issue so it doesn't get >> forgotten? >> >> >> >> On 2 Feb 2015, at 17:53, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: >> >> >> This is by design as the second case creates an anonymous producer that >> >> can send to any destination that it has permission to write to. >> Sending >> >> that advisory every time an anonymous producer sent a message to a >> given >> >> destination would create a flood of advisories which would not really >> be of >> >> help. >> > >> > >> > Why is that? >> > >> > I mean I can create the flood of advisories now anyway. I just have to >> > manually create a non-anonymous producer and it would then send the same >> > number of advisories. >> > >> > Now it’s just slower and you’ve put a burden on me to maintain an LRU >> cache >> > and expiry so that I can have reasonable performance :-( >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com >> > Location: *San Francisco, CA* >> > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com >> > … or check out my Google+ profile >> > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> >> > <http://spinn3r.com> >> > > > > -- > > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > … or check out my Google+ profile > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > <http://spinn3r.com> > > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
