Thanks for your reply! So one could argue that the once-and-only-once guarantee of the jms spec cannot be fulfilled in the special edge case, where there's a "not yet committed, reply lost" happening.
-- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Transactional-Message-Lost-On-Failover-tp4692426p4692881.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
