Yup, and the 5.4.x series was known to have a good number of bugs.

Another concern - if I understand correctly, the Op stated that there is one
session per message?  That's an anti-pattern and a bad practice that will
lead to problems.

Also, the statement of multiple consumers reading from a queue and only
acknowledging each message the consumer is the intended consumer... that
sounds like an anti-pattern as well.  Queue messages are intended for
once-and-only-once consumption.  Intentionally using the acknowledgement
mechanism to allow messages to be re-routed across multiple consumers is a
bad idea full of potential problems.  At the very least, it will yield many
confusing results.




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Session-is-not-getting-closed-tp4693402p4693492.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to