I'm having trouble figuring out why AMQ1 and AMQW1 both have a networkConnector that points to the same endpoint. Can you explain how 10.0.1.53:61616 and 10.0.1.200:61616 map to AMQ1/AMQ2/AMQW1/AMQW2?
Tim On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 6:56 PM, atchijov <and...@tchijov.com> wrote: > I am trying to make ActiveMQ 5.12 and Wildfly 8.2 work on AWS > > I have came up with following configuration: > > - two ActiveMQ servers (AMQ1, AMQ2) with static network connectors pointing > to each other. > - one ActiveMQ (AMQW1, AMQW2, ...) server per each Wildfly server (WF1, > WF2, > ...) with static network connectors pointing to AMQ1 and AMQ2 > - Wildly configured as per > https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/HowToUseOutOfProcessActiveMQWithWildFly > and > act as both producer and consumer of messages on the topic > > It is almost works... When I send message (using ActiveMQ Web Interface) > from either AMQ1 or AMQ2 - all WF servers receive the message. But when one > of the WF servers produce message, the same server receive this message, > but > no one else. > > This gist contains all relevant configuration files: > https://gist.github.com/leapingbytes/a432d40f9fdc11b7d896 > > I would be more than happy to provide any additional information. > > > Your help would be highly appreciated. > > Cheers, > Andrei > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Using-Standalone-ActiveMQ-with-Wildfly-tp4701969.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
