But if the message and its ACK are in different files due to high volumes, and 
cleanup is not occurring due to this, wouldn't you want to increase file size 
from 32mb?

Regards,

Barry 


-----Original Message-----
From: Clebert Suconic [mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:11 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Nothing on queues, Journal files not getting cleaned up

Isn't there any option to compact the journals on activemq5?

In a journal sometimes you have the add-delete-add-add-delete somehow that you 
can't can't really clean it unless you compact the whole thing. Most of the 
times I had this issue was because I had a pending TX or something.


Also: is there any pending XA Transactions?

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:29 AM, <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote:

> All Topic queue sizes in JConsole show 0, and dispatch counts show 0.  
> Any other suggestions?
>
> Regards,
>
> Barry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim 
> Bain
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 1:14 AM
> To: ActiveMQ Users
> Subject: Re: Nothing on queues, Journal files not getting cleaned up
>
> I trust you've confirmed that there are no messages pending on topics 
> as well as queues?  JMX is the easiest way I know to confirm that if 
> you haven't already done so.
>
> Are some but not all journal files being deleted, or none at all?
> On Sep 28, 2015 8:44 AM, <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > How is it that our journal files continue to grow, yet no messages 
> > are on the queues?
> >
> > ActiveMQ 5.11.1, Using KahaDB (not levelDB).
> >
> > How can you tell if a kahaDB scheduler is waiting, and in need of
> clearing?
> >
> > Nothing on the Advisory queues (no network of brokers), nothing on 
> > the DLQ.  Where else can I look?  Our txlogs are very large as well.
> > Application Teams advise their transaction processing IS committing 
> > on
> gets
> > and puts, etc..
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Barry
> >
> >
> >
>



--
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to