Yes, there is a queue on Broker A called TEST with 1 message on it. We have a consumer connect to Broker B and listen on TEST.
I see nothing on Broker A, TEST queue via JConsole that a consumer is listening. I do see on Broker B that the consumer created the queue called TEST, but the message from Broker A is not forwarded to it. Regards, Barry -----Original Message----- From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 1:21 AM To: ActiveMQ Users Subject: RE: Network of Brokers - Putting/Getting from a queue Have you done the producerless test I described earlier? On Oct 1, 2015 8:38 AM, <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote: > Could this be an issue? > > BrokerA is where the consumer listens for the message. > > BrokerB is where the message is placed on the TEST queue. > > When the client app connects to BrokerA to listen, the MDB > automatically creates the TEST queue on BrokerA and listens there. > > So the message on BrokerB TEST queue is still there even though the > app is listening on the automatically created TEST queue on BrokerA > now. Should the app be creating the queue on BrokerA? > > Regards, > > Barry > > > -----Original Message----- > From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim > Bain > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 10:20 AM > To: ActiveMQ Users > Subject: RE: Network of Brokers - Putting/Getting from a queue > > Stop testing with a producer; it's completely irrelevant. Messages > traverse a network of brokers because they are pulled by consumers, > not because they are pushed by producers. So everything you need to > know about the operation of a network of brokers can be determined by > examining the interaction of consumers and brokers; producers don't matter. > > Delete the destination from both brokers, then do the test that > describe to you. > On Oct 1, 2015 7:58 AM, <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote: > > > So the client connected to brokerB and put a message, but this > > created a queue called TEST as well. Now we have queue TEST on > > broker A and queue TEST on brokerB as well. So the listener on > > BrokerA is listening to TEST queue on BrokerA, and no one is > > listening to TEST queue on BrokerB. Do I need to configure > > something differently? Or does the client not need to specify creating a > > dynamic queue called TEST? > > > > Regards, > > > > Barry > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim > > Bain > > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 9:13 AM > > To: ActiveMQ Users > > Subject: RE: Network of Brokers - Putting/Getting from a queue > > > > On Oct 1, 2015 7:02 AM, <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Have you disabled advisory messages and/or explicitly > > > included/excluded > > any destinations? > > > I have added nothing in the activemq.xml file to exclude advisory > > messages, etc. > > > > > > And have you done anything to prevent the broker from > > > auto-creating > > destinations? > > > Again, nothing added to the activemq.xml file. Do I need to add > > something? Is there a parm I need to add for auto-creation? > > > > No, it's default behavior; the question was whether you'd disabled it. > > > > > If I add a queue called TEST on brokerA, it does not appear on brokerB. > > Should it? > > > > No. Instead, it should be created on A when a consumer subscribes > > to it > on > > B. Does that happen? > > > > > When both brokers are up and you connect the consumer to broker B, > broker > > B should register itself as a consumer on broker A. You can confirm > > whether this is happening by attaching a JMX viewer such as JConsole > > to broker A and navigating to the destinations to confirm that the > destination > > has been created on A and that B is a consumer on it. > > > Should I see the same queue name on both Brokers? > > > > Yes, and one consumer listed under it on each broker. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Barry > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > > > Tim > Bain > > > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 8:56 AM > > > To: ActiveMQ Users > > > Subject: RE: Network of Brokers - Putting/Getting from a queue > > > > > > Your assumption is correct, networks of brokers allow messages to > > > be > > forwarded across the network to be consumed by consumers on brokers > > other than the one on which the message was produced. > > > > > > Have you disabled advisory messages and/or explicitly > > > included/excluded > > any destinations? And have you done anything to prevent the broker > > from auto-creating destinations? If so, please describe what you've > > done, because that could explain what you're seeing. > > > > > > When both brokers are up and you connect the consumer to broker B, > broker > > B should register itself as a consumer on broker A. You can confirm > > whether this is happening by attaching a JMX viewer such as JConsole > > to broker A and navigating to the destinations to confirm that the > destination > > has been created on A and that B is a consumer on it. > > > > > > Tim > > > On Oct 1, 2015 5:58 AM, <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Here's the issue we are having: > > > > > > > > Broker A > > > > Broker B > > > > Network Connector to Broker B > Network > > > > Connector to Broker A > > > > (Broker A discovers Network Connector in Log) (Broker B > > > > discovers Network Connector in Log) > > > > Queue: TEST defined here > > > > > > > > Application A puts message on queue TEST - Success Application B > > > > connects to Broker B and performs a 'read' on queue TEST > > > > > > > > No success reading from queue TEST > > > > > > > > The assumption is that Application B can read from destination > > > > TEST > if > > > > it connects on Broker B, even though the queue is defined on > > > > Broker > A. > > > > Is my assumption incorrect? If so, how do we accomplish this design? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Barry > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Basmajian, Raffi [mailto:rbasmaj...@ofiglobal.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:07 PM > > > > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: Network of Brokers - Putting/Getting from a queue > > > > > > > > Barry, > > > > > > > > No, not from the client perspective, there is no special designation. > > > > Provided <networkConnectors> config permits message flow between > > > > A > and > > > > B, messages should flow in the direction of the connector config. > > > > > > > > Raffi > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com > > > > [mailto:barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 2:24 PM > > > > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > > > Subject: Network of Brokers - Putting/Getting from a queue [ > > > > EXTERNAL ] > > > > Importance: High > > > > > > > > If we have 2 brokers defined in a network together, and we > > > > define a queue on broker A, and an application connects to > > > > Broker B to put a message on that queue, should the message just > > > > go there? Do we need to specify that it is a 'network' queue? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Barry > > > > > > > > > > > > This e-mail transmission may contain information that is > > > > proprietary, privileged and/or confidential and is intended > > > > exclusively for the > > > > person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention > > > > or disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or > > > > the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If > > > > you are not the intended recipient or their designee, please > > > > notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all > > > > copies. OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole discretion, monitor, > > > > review, retain and/or disclose the content of all email communications. > > > > > > >
