Are you saying that you're using the priorityBackup=true option, or not? That wasn't clear (to me) from what you wrote.
Tim On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Rallavagu <rallav...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are referring "priorityBackup=true" then I have only one URL with > master/slave and NoB and expect the "updateClusterClients" to work. One > more item that I have noticed is that, when two clients are connected to > one of the clusters, when the third client is attempting to connect to the > same cluster, it is actually forwarded to connect to other cluster (which > has no clients at that time). > > > On 12/9/15 6:21 PM, Basmajian, Raffi wrote: > >> I don't believe client failback would work with those settings alone, >> Read section titled "More information" here >> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rallavagu [mailto:rallav...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 8:40 PM >> To: users@activemq.apache.org >> Subject: Re: NoB and Load Balancing [ EXTERNAL ] >> >> I am using the example that are shipped with ActiveMQ. Here is the >> example, >> >> /opt/activemq/apache-ant-1.9.6/bin/ant consumer -Durl=failover:'(tcp:// >> activemq2.localtest.net:61616)' -Dtopic=false -Dsubject=foo.bar >> >> On 12/9/15 4:19 PM, Basmajian, Raffi wrote: >> >>> Show the client-side configuration you're using. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Rallavagu [mailto:rallav...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 7:04 PM >>> To: users@activemq.apache.org >>> Subject: NoB and Load Balancing [ EXTERNAL ] >>> >>> ActiveMQ 5.12.1 >>> >>> Setup Network of Brokers between two clusters of Master/Slave brokers. >>> With reference to following links, >>> >>> http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-features-in-activemq-54-au >>> tomatic.html >>> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html >>> >>> Configured "updateClusterClients" and "rebalanceClusterClients" to >>> achieve load balancing. Used a test case as below. >>> >>> 1. connect client 1 to cluster 1 >>> 2. connect client 2 to cluster 2 >>> 3. shutdown cluster 1. Now, client 1 is automatically connected to >>> cluster 2. >>> 4. started cluster 1 back. >>> >>> Was expecting client 1 to re-connect to cluster 1 and balance the load. >>> But, I do not see that happening. Is this the right expectation? Also, I >>> have noticed that some times if two clients are connecting to one of the >>> clusters, they are automatically re-connected to other cluster which is a >>> desirable behavior. Essentially, Wondering if I can rely one those >>> configuration parameters for load balancing. Thanks. >>> >>> This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, >>> privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the >>> person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or >>> disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended >>> recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>> recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return >>> e-mail and delete all copies. OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole discretion, >>> monitor, review, retain and/or disclose the content of all email >>> communications. >>> >> >>
