Thanks to all who have replied. Appreciated. It kinda confirmed my suspicion about current situation.
Anyways: JMS has been good for us. It has played its part in being a (rather simple) vendor agnostic facade to various MOMs. I think we'll skip the ActiveMQ case for now. Peter -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 2/29/16, artnaseef <a...@artnaseef.com> wrote: Subject: Re: Recommendation for vendor independent strategy To: users@activemq.apache.org Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 7:04 PM It may be possible to build a facade, if you don't need all of the features of the 2.0 spec. For example, ActiveMQ has an async send features that producers can use, which may meet your needs. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Recommendation-for-vendor-independent-strategy-tp4708598p4708617.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
