KahaDB has HA with ZooKeeper ?
-----Original Message----- From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 7:01 AM To: ActiveMQ Users <users@activemq.apache.org> Subject: Re: Activemq HA without shared Database or Shared file system There used to be a share-nothing master-slave configuration but it was buggy and never worked right and has since been removed. Replicated LevelDB is the only option that doesn't have a singleton resource, though you could make the argument that the Zookeeper cluster is a singleton resource spread over multiple hosts, or that JDBC to a clustered Oracle instance is no more of a singleton resource than the Zookeeper cluster. As for whether replicated LevelDB is production ready, it's really a question of how willing you are to experience bugs in production (and then be an active part of the investigation). Replicated LevelDB is far less buggy than it was a few versions back, but they haven't all been shaken out yet, and this mailing list lacks an active LevelDB expert and many LevelDB questions go unanswered, so you'll need to be able to figure out how to get it working mostly on your own (using the wiki and the mailing list archives), and if you hit a bug you may need to investigate it yourself. None of this is insurmountable, it's just a question of your personality, your willingness to invest time into it, and your willingness to possibly run into bugs. If you're able to live with those negatives and you'd like to help make LevelDB better for the community, go for it. If you want something that's as stable as possible and will require the least possible amount of effort from you, go with KahaDB. On Apr 1, 2016 5:37 AM, "James A. Robinson" <j...@highwire.org> wrote: > Some people are using it. I wanted to, but decided I wasn't comfortable > relying on it. > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 19:15 Natarajan, Rajeswari < > rajeswari.natara...@sap.com> wrote: > > > Is replicated level DB store production ready now. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James A. Robinson [mailto:j...@highwire.org] > > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:19 PM > > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Activemq HA without shared Database or Shared file system > > > > I'm not aware of any other choice. I initially tried to use the > replicated > > leveldb system but ran into too many stability issues. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:17 PM Natarajan, Rajeswari < > > rajeswari.natara...@sap.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Would like to know if ActiveMQ supports HA with message replication > > > without the shared DB or shared file system > > > > > > I see that there is a replicated level DB store which requires a zoo > > > keeper. Is there any other mechanism available other than these > options > > > where messages are getting replicated to the standby. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Rajeswari > > > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/replicated-leveldb-store.html > > > > > >
