Hello Hassen,


Reasons:

1. Our last upgrade of SonicMQ was 10 years ago. We would like to look at
alternatives as well. Specially when we are looking for a product for C++,
Java, Progress, c#.NET etc. So something which fits for all and with a
degree of high performance, scalability and reliability.

2. Why ActiveMQ - Openness - Most popular open source. We are comfortable
with Open Source space. Not tied to a single company. Thought about other
products like IBM one and RabbitMQ but ActiveMQ will do the job for us. We
don't do any complex stuff like network of brokers or constantly open and
close producer / consumers.

3. Benchmarking:

Here is one of the queries posted by me in past. It includes links for
benchmarking I did. I must admit that it's based on our use case scenario
only. But overall, hopefully it will help.

http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Performance-tc4712952.html

It's for C++/Java/Progress (we say it spark). This is on like for like
system.

Happy to help if any queries.

Thanks
AJK




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Who-uses-ActiveMQ-in-Finance-Banking-Markets-tp4715117p4715141.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to