Hi Martyn,

Thanks a lot for this!

It could save us just in time...


As soon as I can, I'll try to build artemis from your last commit and make some 
tests.

I'll give you a feedback.


Francesco

________________________________
From: Martyn Taylor <mtay...@redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 1:22:52 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ARTEMIS: bad-performance behaviour after 7-10 days of usage

Francesco,

I think I've identified the cause of this problem.  There were two issues
which are now fixed as part of:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1002

I'll get these fixes cherry-picked onto Artemis 1.x stream.

I plan on doing a 1.5.3 (with these changes included) within the next
couple of days.

Cheers
Martyn

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:33 AM, francesco81 <francesco.padov...@bticino.it>
wrote:

> Hi Martyn,
> I'll be happy to enjoy the IRC chat as soon as I can.
> Effectively, your words about the "treating as new subscription" would
> explain the issue with retained messages.
> However there's still something that I don't understand: for example why
> also the non-retained messages are resent on resubscription. Regardless if
> retained or not, it seems that all messages persist on queue (or, in case
> of
> retained, they persist on address and one more reference is added on queue
> at each resubscription... I don't know, I'm trying to guess) and are never
> discarded.
> How are they managed by artemis? In a scenario where clients never connect
> with "cleanSession=false" (that is our usecase), I thought:
> - non-retained messages are removed from address (and references from
> queues) once they are consumed by clients (or immediatly if no client is
> connected).
> - retained messages are removed from address when a new one arrives (and
> the
> reference to the new one substitutes the previous on the queue).
> Is not so? I'm wrong somewhere?
>
> Again, thanks for your patience.
>
> Francesco
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/ARTEMIS-bad-performance-behaviour-after-7-10-days-of-usage-
> tp4721272p4721678.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

________________________________

Ce message, ainsi que tous les fichiers joints ? ce message, peuvent contenir 
des informations sensibles et/ ou confidentielles ne devant pas ?tre 
divulgu?es. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire de ce message (ou que vous 
recevez ce message par erreur), nous vous remercions de le notifier 
imm?diatement ? son exp?diteur, et de d?truire ce message. Toute copie, 
divulgation, modification, utilisation ou diffusion, non autoris?e, directe ou 
indirecte, de tout ou partie de ce message, est strictement interdite.


This e-mail, and any document attached hereby, may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received 
this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this 
e-mail. Any unauthorized, direct or indirect, copying, disclosure, distribution 
or other use of the material or parts thereof is strictly forbidden.

Reply via email to