Are you using NFSv4? Can you test whether you can acquire an NFS file lock in that location without using ActiveMQ? Take ActiveMQ out of the mix and make sure your underlying infrastructure works.
Tim On Mar 30, 2017 11:29 AM, "akhil" <akh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gary , > > I have a same setup as bala. Two brokers with common shared file storage > but > when the brokers are getting started up both are on slave modes. The shared > file storage is not being used by any other broker. We created a new mount > and tested with that , but still the two brokers are on slave mode. It's > either of them is not getting lock on the file storage. Any idea on why > both > brokers going under slave mode ? > > Thanks, > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/Active-mq-5-7-slave-broker-does-not-get-the- > lock-when-the-master-is-brought-down-tp4666988p4724368.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
