I think it's pretty clear at this point that Artemis is the future. However, I don't know that renaming it to ActiveMQ 6 makes any sense as it would be a lot of work and more confusion.
My opinion would be to just have the roadmap say Artemis is the future and recommended broker and drop plans to have an ActiveMQ 6 release. We can just keep using the current versioning that Artemis is already using. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/15/2017 10:04 AM, Jiri Danek wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Justin Bertram <jbert...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >> Ultimately I believe the decision is in the hands of the ActiveMQ PMC [1]. >>> >>> Where can I find a list of PMC members for ActiveMQ? The closest I got to >> it is http://activemq.apache.org/team.html >> > The info for that is here: > https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?activemq > > > -- > Tim Bish > >
