OK, so you've sent 5 messages to the queue, and they've been round-robined across the two consumers, so one consumer got three messages and one got two. Apparently the consumer you're looking at is the one that got two messages, but the key here is that the other three messages weren't lost, they were consumed by the other consumer.
So, why do you have a second consumer on that queue? One possibility is that you're using a network of brokers and the second consumer is a networked broker, but since you've told us very little about how you've configured your broker(s) I can't guess whether that might be the explanation. If not, it's something you're doing (or that a co-worker is doing), because ActiveMQ doesn't create consumers on your destinations except in the case of a network of brokers (and even then, messages aren't lost, they just go to the other brokers and from there to other consumers). Tim On Nov 22, 2017 11:22 AM, "dfco21" <aelba...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Please find more details. > > Actually, all the messages are sent to the Queue (starting with uuid_ in > the > screenshot below) but 3 are automatically queued and only 2 (instead of 5) > are available to the consumer (not starting with uuid_ in the screenshot > below). > > We're using the version 5.14.5. No consumer strategy is enabled nor > expiration time. > > > Properties screenshot (we are sending messages through a Service Cloud) : > <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/t378791/Picture2.png> > > Queues page of the web console (5 messages have been sent, all the messages > have been received in the queue but 3 are automatically dequeued and the > consumer has only 2 messages available instead of 5): > <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/t378791/Picture3.png> > > Please let me know if any question. > > Thanks, AEB > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User- > f2341805.html >
