That configuration server no purpose. The configuration would be semantically identical if you just left it out.
For what it's worth, the HA policy has nothing to do with the use-case you described. HA is for dealing with broker failures, not message distribution around a cluster. Justin On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:48 PM artemisn00b <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you think there's any advantage of using a cluster of 3 nodes, and an HA > policy - live-only, without scale down? > > <ha-policy> > <live-only> > <scale-down> > <enabled>false</enabled> > <connectors> > <connector-ref>server2-connector</connector-ref> > <connector-ref>server3-connector</connector-ref> > </connectors> > </scale-down> > </live-only> > </ha-policy> > > Would this serve any purpose at all? What I'm trying is, to have 1 producer > and 3 subscribers. I have 3 Artemis servers, and I want to create a system > where producer can send messages to any server, and all subscribers on the > same Topic, will receive it. > Currently, I've setup an On-demand load balancing system with a symmetric > cluster. So I wanted to know, if the above HA-policy makes any sense to the > setup I have. I tried with and without the ha-policy, but I wanted to know > if there is any caveat to this. > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >
