They are using version 5.14.5

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 4:07:23 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org>
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ multiple JDBC data sources in same configuration

Hmm,

Which ActiveMQ version ?

It might inherit the main ds from the persistence adapter. I will check 
tomorrow my time.

Regards
JB

> Le 25 mai 2021 à 18:03, Vince Cox <v...@perforce.com> a écrit :
>
> JB,
>
> My customer has gone this route and ActiveMQ started, however only the first 
> data source listed (dsmain in your example) was used. Both the messages and 
> locker were using only one datasource.
>
> Any thoughts around that?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vince
>
> On 5/25/21, 12:14 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofre" <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>    Hi Vince,
>
>    It’s possible to have different datasource: one for the main message 
> store, one for the lease locker.
>
>    As JDBC leaser locker extends persistent adapter, you can pass a 
> datasource. Something like this should work:
>
>    <persistenceAdapter>
>        <jdbcPersistenceAdapter dataDirectory="${activemq.data}" 
> dataSource="#dsmain" lockKeepAlivePeriod="5000">
>          <locker>
>            <lease-database-locker dataSource="#dslock" 
> lockAcquireSleepInterval="10000"/>
>          </locker>
>        </jdbcPersistenceAdapter>
>      </persistenceAdapter>
>
>    You can take a look on 
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.nanthrax.net%2F%3Fp%3D422&amp;data=04%7C01%7CVCox%40perforce.com%7C230af87a86d34051ffb808d91fb8bbc4%7C95b666d19a7549ab95a38969fbcdc08c%7C0%7C0%7C637575701286906268%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=AU%2F8myyTjqpnA18yYCNe%2BOpkLpB8LtSytRIr3FlQx0I%3D&amp;reserved=0
>  
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.nanthrax.net%2F%3Fp%3D422&amp;data=04%7C01%7CVCox%40perforce.com%7C230af87a86d34051ffb808d91fb8bbc4%7C95b666d19a7549ab95a38969fbcdc08c%7C0%7C0%7C637575701286906268%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=AU%2F8myyTjqpnA18yYCNe%2BOpkLpB8LtSytRIr3FlQx0I%3D&amp;reserved=0>
>
>    Regards
>    JB
>
>> Le 24 mai 2021 à 22:42, Vince Cox <v...@perforce.com> a écrit :
>>
>> Are there any future plans with ActiveMQ that will provide separate data 
>> source (using JDBC) to handle leader activity and message traffic? We are 
>> aware we can use kahaDB and JDBC, but we’d like to have a separate JDBC 
>> sources for our message store and our lock.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Vince
>>
>>
>> This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If 
>> you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any 
>> attachments and notify us immediately.
>>
>
>
>
>    CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not 
> click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
> the content is safe.
>
>
> This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any 
> attachments and notify us immediately.
>



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.


This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments 
and notify us immediately.

Reply via email to