Just to be sure, I downloaded and decompiled org.apache.activemq:artemis-jakarta-client:2.18.0 and the org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQConnectionFactory *does* return an instance of org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQConnection that implements jakarta.jms.Connection.
Are you sure all your classloading is working correctly and that you don't have any other ActiveMQ Artemis jars on the classpath? I recently added an example [1] to the code-base that uses the Jakarta Messaging 3.0 API, and it works fine. I would expect your use-case to work as well. Justin [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/main/examples/features/standard/queue-jakarta On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:12 AM Jack Shirazi <jack.shir...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > Yes, artemis-jakarta-client version 2.18.0 > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:11 PM Domenico Francesco Bruscino < > bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Jack, > > > > are you using `artemis-jakarta-client` [1]? > > > > [1] > > > > > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/artemis-jakarta-client > > > > Regards, > > Domenico > > > > On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 13:36, Jack Shirazi <jack.shir...@elastic.co > > .invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I'm trying to have a fully EE9 (so only using jakarta.jms* imports) > > > implementation. jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory is not compatible > > > with ActiveMQConnectionFactory as that returns a > > > javax.jms.ConnectionFactory. I couldn't see an alternative connection > > > factory that provides a jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory in the Artemis > > > implementation. > > > > > >
