That's great! Tell me if there's anything needed to be done. Kind regards, Endre Stølsvik
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 7:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Endre, > > I’m doing the review now but, yeah, it looks good enough to include it for > 5.16.4. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 29 janv. 2022 à 03:48, Endre Stølsvik <en...@stolsvik.com> a écrit : > > > > No chance of getting this along? > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/749 > > (The "firstMessageTimestamp" - I could quickly change the name if that is > > wanted, to "headMessageTimestamp") > > Even if a more comprehensive solution is wanted, the PRs rather small > > improvement nevertheless stands on its own. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:14 AM JB Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> It was supposed to be last weekend but we had couple of Jira to work on. > >> > >> So the vote is planned for this weekend. > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >>> Le 27 janv. 2022 à 22:43, Paul Burgess <pburg...@peersoftware.com> a > >> écrit : > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Do we know roughly when 5.16.4 will be released? > >>> > >>> Sorry if you've answered this already, I couldn't find it in any of the > >> recent threads. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >> > >> > >
